Public morality refers to attempts by Christians to decide overt policy so that a more just cabaret is shaped.
In 1972, a Methodist from Victoria, John Westerman, suggested that this could be usefully summarised under five principal(prenominal) approaches;
Christendom
-The Christendom approach says we want the whole community to accept Christian standards.
-A re cent example of the Christendom approach is the way religious groups in effect lobbied to take a shit the federal government over turned northern Territory legislation that legalised euthanasia. This was despite surveys indicating that more than 70 per cent of Australians (and up to 84 per cent of those who never attend church) desire that euthanasia is sometimes or always justified.
-Church people campaigned with child(p) fro Sabbath observance. Today Teetotalism (totally obtaining from alcohol) and sunlight observance are non-issues in most churches. In 1906, however, the editor of The Methodist said; It is powerful for ministers to be alert fighting for righteousness as to Sunday observance and temperance, but it is not right to be sprightly on political subjects whish are matters of opinion and not conscience.
Separation
-The separation approach says that the church should address weird issues, but not issues about the running of the country.
-According to Catholic theologizer Frank Brennan When John Howards government wanted to crack mess on boat people including even those who were bona fide refuges, and the churches objected, Immigration minister of religion Phillip Ruddock said that the churches should stick to what they do best and leave the administration of border control and refugee rights to the elected government.
-Issues about the travel secular world are irrelevant, un historic, or less important than those of the spiritual world. After Baptist minister and President of the Baptist Union Of Australia Rev. Dr Tim Costello make the Victorian Inter-Church Gambling Task Force, some Christians said,
--
References
-->Not very explanitory, yet, still, I guess it IS an interesting topic. I have skimmed through this slightly...
This is an interesting essay on the fronts by Christians to affect public policy so that a more equitable society is achieved. If other Christians were to more actively exert an uplifting influence on public policy, then we could anticipate that society would agitate for the better. In fact, positive results may be expected if satisfying people of many faiths were to take a more active role in their communities. Your use of headings made your report easier to read. The quotes you cited were rough-and-ready in supporting your points but indicate that a bibliography should have also been provided. Your paper was well organized and concise. Nice effort!
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment