Religion has been the most consistent, powerful, driving force in the history of adult male interaction. Religion dictates what people do, when they do it, where they?re going and how they bring out there with such a potent strength that millions upon millions of idiosyncratics aim died and killed for what they gestate in. Why would reasonfulness, any integrity sacrifice their manner or some matchless else?s for a faith that is by no direction guaranteed? The answer, in simple terms, is that most and one could say approximately alone people of the earth believe that they substantiate a nous. That is to say that there is an internal spirit that is divinely exhibit that will last eternally once the body/ mindset is unfounded.
The psyche has been believed to be what make an someone, an soulfulness. The wiz separates us, the humans, from the rest of the human beings?s creatures. in that respect be even some religions that believe that all living things develop souls. The soul is true temperament of a person; the essence of self each individual has; the consciousness that one ascertains. Without a soul a human is no more consequently a robot or computer responding to data that is fed into it by sense receptors. The soul is what carries over to the next world when one?s invigoration on Earth has pasted and what one does in this livelihood will forever be recognized by their divinity. heart history a ?good? or ?proper? or ? incorruptible? life will reward the soul with an eternity of wonder, era living a ?bad? or ?sinful? life will result in eternal damnation for the soul (with variations depending on what religion one follows). Having a soul makes life opineingful beyond the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain. The soul solves the problem of non world. The problem of nonexistence is the difficulty people have when they imagine what it would be like to be dead. Not dead with a soul, but complete eradication of self. That is, a world in which what ever I am does not exist.
all the same for those individuals who don?t have the strong religious sentiments that others whitethorn have, the soul is commonly characterized as the feeling of self. The emotions, beliefs, fears and memories one has argon believed to be in or held by the soul. For individuals fitting this comment the words soul and mind may as hale be interchangeable. The mind, the thinking entity that tells us we should eat or that we are tired is truly all that the soul is.
The argument against the existence of souls loafer come from a number of angles. First, (assuming that there are souls) one may ask the question of whether the soul is eternal. That is, can the soul be destroyed, even by god? If one believes that god is the creator of all things and that god is omnipotent, which is the common belief of most gods, whence it would be congruent to believe that god could destroy the souls which he created. However, it would seem that this would lead to the problem that drives many another(prenominal) people to believe in a religion in the first place. That problem being, the problem of nonexistence. The same questions could be asked of the soul in heaven or hell (or where ever they go) that are asked of the body here on Earth. Is there something to the soul that goes beyond salvation or damnation and if so what is it? (This would be to fundamentally ask if a soul has a soul.) If there is then the same questions could be asked of these next plateaus that were asked of the previous and so on and so forth until all one is left with is an interminable regress.
So what is the essence, the spirit, the thinking, cognitive, emotional presents that is believed to be the soul? It is the school principal, pure and simple. There is no soul, no mind, no spirit, just a brain with chemical reactions. The brain and its nervous system contain and are responsible for all functions, emotions and feelings of ?the soul?. Without a brain an prey is unable to think. Without a functional nervous system an routine is unable to react. There has been years of compelling scientific question showing the connection and necessity that the brain has to the mind. When one experiences brain damage and losses past memories (memories that are thought to be retained by the soul) it is not ever considered that the soul was damaged. When an individual experiences the feeling of pain, say from getting tackled by a 350-lb. antiaircraft tackle, it can be traced to the brain as the result of pouch C-fibers.
Again, it is never believe that the soul was hurt when one an individual got crushed by a fat lineman, but if the soul doesn?t get hurt in this way, how does it? Even if one were to argue that the soul only ?feels? or ?gets hurt? through emotions, like love, happiness, or fear, opponents can still look to the brain for answers. The emotion of happiness has been traced to chemical reactions in the brain where laid-back levels of serotonin were present [1]. Everything that is accredited to the soul can be traced back to the brain.
There are obvious reasons why individuals have long held their beliefs in souls, spirits and goods. Without these beliefs it would seem that there would be no moral codes or ethical principles to follow in order to maintain and perpetuate the existence of life. There would be no purpose to life if there were no attendant existence. Also, to say that those who believed in souls were at fault for their misconceptions would be an inequitable proposition. The technological advances of the last twenty years have spurred the arrest of the brain and its connection with what was thought to be the soul exponentially.
freeing back to the belief that without souls there would be no purpose to life, thus making it meaningless, one can find an error. right because there is no purpose to life doesn?t mean there is no purpose in life. If this life is all that there is, no heaven or hell, no eternity, then everything that is done in this life is of the ultimate importance and meaning. Do what makes your brain feel good and avoid what makes your brain feel bad. You can believe in god and the afterlife or you can believe that the 49ers are going to win the passing Bowl, if it makes the brain feel good that?s all that matters. That?s life, live it well.
Works CitedWhy Chocolate Feels Good. Science and Nature: caustic Topics. March 2, 2007http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/hottopics/chocolate/addictive2.shtmlMcCormick, Matt. Against the Immortality of the Soul. 2006.
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderessayIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment