New Theory of Criminology

He advocated a overture that punishment should be swift, certain(a), and proportional to the law-breaking. He also advocated the abolishment of both corporal and capital punishment, a revolutionary opinion in his time. His work was promoted by Bentham, particularly in his defend An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Beccaria and Bentham believed that people committed disgusts when they believed that the chance of rewards to them would be greater than the likelihood of punishment (Hollin, 2004, 2). It was the pain/ cheer put one across of human behavior: that humans sought to gain pleasure and avoid pain. These men believed that people acted on the principle of unfreeze will: they made a choice of what behaviors to indulge in and therefore should obtain the consequences if caught in criminal acts. The emphasis on human-centered rationality led these theorists to the position that perpetrators of crimes should be held personally responsible for their actions and punished according to the severity of the crime (Juvenile, 2005, 71). nether these circumstances, criminal law must match the needs of the item-by-item to the needs of beau monde as a whole, with neither want a crime to be committed (Hollin, 2004, 2). This is achieved by the society making the punishment for committing a crime harsh plentiful that no one will want to take the luck of engaging in criminal behavior and being caught.

below these conditions, Bentham believed that p

http://wwwsagepub.com/Martin%20Chapter%203%20Juvenile%20

Classical hypothesis saw a resurgence in the late twentieth century in the United States, when its central values were employ to the effort to crackdown on juvenile delinquency and crime (Juvenile, 2005, 73). The school of thought which formed the basis of the American criminal justice brass switched away from trying to rehabilitate offenders and turned again towards punishment, incapacitation and deterrence. Since unmixed theory is based on the notion that people go free will and atomic number 18 rational, it is assumed that they know what they are doing and the risks they are taking when they break the law and therefore should suffer the consequences.

Any mitigating social circumstances, such as family situation, economic bereavement etc., are considered secondary to the individual's decision to break the law.

If the punishment is progressively harsher as the level of the crime increases, so that the cost of the crime always outweighs the benefits, then punishment can act as a deterrent (Hollin, 2004, 2; Juvenile, 2005, 71-72).

http://www.criminology.su.edu/crimtheory/week3.tm

Brief go over of sociological explanation of crime. ND. Retrieved Nov. 8, 2005 from

The neo perfect theory endorses most of the uncorrupted theory, with two exceptions: a rejection of the rigidity of the classical system of punishment, and a degree of subjectivity (discretion) when assessing criminal responsibility (Brief, 2001). A feature of speech feature of the neoclassical system is the plea bargain, which gives the prosecution and defense reaction an opportunity to make a deal in which the charge will plead guilty in return for certain considerations such as a reduced sentence or charge on a lesser crime. Like classical theory, neoclassical theory assumes that the accused calculated the risks before committing the crime and is therefore willing to accept the punishment.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.