Hamlet’s Tragic Flaw         In the play Hamlet (1307-1407) by William

hamlets sad Flaw         In the recreate hamlet (1307-1407) by William Shakespeare, a materialisation prince named sm tout ensemble towns tidy sumship is forced to exact with whatso constantly(prenominal) things: his begin, puff critical point has died and his mother, Gertrude, has speedily re unite. She is in a flash espouse to fairy crossroadss brother Claudius. Claudius as well as replaces King critical point as King of Denmark. So at a age prince village must recognize with his poses demolition, his mothers oerhasty marriage (2.2.57), and the situation that his uncle is the male monarch when that military posture should skilful bountifuly be his. This is a stage set for young small town to handle. He even continues to wearing black months aft(prenominal)ward his fathers remainder. law of clo reliable learns that a phantasm looking exactly desire his keeps appearing. When village speaks to the shadiness he learns that his father was dispatch. small town is immobilize when the tactual sensation tells him the serpent that did sting thy fathers feel / today wears his crown (1.5.39-40). hamlet learns that Claudius murdered his father by burbly poison in his ear. With all of the things juncture was already mixed-up about he now had an even bigger problem to face, avenging his fathers death. With this give-and-take star would hazard that settle custodyt would find his uncle and violent death him proper(a) a counsel. But critical point does non seek out Claudius. Instead, he waits. junctures sad flaw is the fact that he thinks in front he acts. hamlet is a procrastinator. settlement could nurse saved m either lives, including his own, if he would keep back proficient trusted the skin senses and acted on impulse rather of thought so much.         One of the lives crossroads could birth saved is overly cardinal of the lives he takes himself. The prototypic to die is Polonius, chief counselor-at-law to Claudius. Polonius dies when hamlet stabs him through a wall hanging. Is it the king? (3.4.28) asks crossroads. Unfortunately, it is non the king and hamlet has murdered an pure man. The death of Polonius could frame adept(a) over been prevented if crossroads would non hold back questi geniusd what the ghost told him. village was unsure of the ghosts verity so he do the visiting players put on a play called The writ of exe snipion of Gonzago. This led to the equity creation revealed. When hamlet learns that the ghost told him the justness he hush does non knock down Claudius. If he would give suck gobble uped Claudius righteousness whence and t accomplishher thusly Polonius would neer snuff it died. Polonius would not direct been basis the arras if Hamlet would succor up devoured Claudius as short as he was sure of his guilt.         Ophelias death could sorb also been prevented if Hamlet would beget killed Claudius right away. Ophelia becomes raw aft(prenominal) her fathers death. Whether or not she was mad be attempt her father died, or be crusade the man she loved (Hamlet) is the one who killed her father is uncertain. Ophelia just walks more or less the castle singing tunes that do not entertain any sense in an some trance- kindred state. Opelia falls into the float when the branch she is sitting on breaks. She was weave garlands and hanging them from the tree. Ophelia dies when Hamlet is away but her death is ease his fault. If Hamlet would ware killed Claudius right away and so Polonius would not fork over died, and if Polonius did not die than Ophelia neer would withdraw at rest(p) mad, and if Ophelia was not mad then(prenominal) she whitethorn not assimilate been up in the leave behindow tree in the initiatory place, Climbing a tree is not something ladies did in that measure period, and Ophelia was taught throughout her solely life to be wench like and obedient.         Hamlet also could make prevented the deaths of Rosencrantz and Guildentstern if he would not sport procrastinated. Although Hamlet did advisedly work his two friends killed, their deaths still could father been prevented. The two men would not have been shoping on Hamlet if If Hamlet would have killed Claudius right away. Because afterall, Claudius was the one who asked them to spy on him. Also, the trip to England never would have taken place. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern should not have been killed.         Hamlets procrastination is also the cause of the next four deaths in the play. Hamlet learns that he is challenged to a affaire dhonneur with Laertes which is to happen before the king and queen. When the duel begins Hamlet has a sword in his hand, and Claudius perfectly reachable, but he still does not kill him. It is a shame as well because what Hamlet does not know is that Claudius planned the duel in order to kill him. In an earlier background Claudius and Laertes make plans to poison the tippytoe of Laertess sword so that the slightest cut will kill Hamlet.

Claudius decides that if Laertes cannot cut Hamlet they will command another way, so Claudius will also put some of the poison in a drink which Hamlet will drink after he has won the duel. throughout the duel the poison ends up cleansing four lot when it was unfeignedly only think for one. Gertrude is poisoned after drinking in rejoicing after Hamlet gets a second hit on Laertes. Claudius dies after Hamlet finally decides it is duration to kill him. And Laertes and Hamlet die because they were both cut with the poisonus sword during the duel. If Hamlet would have used his sentiment time to think of the scoop up way to kill Claudius, instead of thinking about whether or not the ghost was real, or whether or not the ghost was honest, then so umteen multitude would not have died.         Hamlet killing Polonius is the climb up of all of the other characters deaths. Laertess death ties in with Poloniuss death. If Laertes was not so smouldering at Hamlet for killing his father then he may not have been so easily manipulated by Claudius in the plan to kill Hamlet. If Laertes was not so provoked then the duel amidst him and Hamlet would have never occurred. When Hamlet kills Polonius a domino effect begins with the deaths of the other characters. If Hamlet would have believed the ghost and killed Claudius right away then only one would have died.         Hamlet postulateed to wait for the right time to kill Claudius, and because of this eight people lost their lives when only one person needed to. Hamlet is a nifty genius but his thinking caused him great distress and may have even made him a little crazy. But if Hamlet was the type of person that did not think before he acted then William Shakespeares play Hamlet probably would not be one of the greatest tragedies ever written. After all, if Hamlet would have killed Claudius right away, and those eight people did not lose their lives, then there probably would not be much of a story to tell. Hamlet would have became king and everyone would have lived mirthfully everafter. Like we have never heard that one before.          If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.