However the author has failed to provide fitted textual evidence to support his claim and might wee-wee overlooked other possibilities.
Turley argued that violent toys offer advantages because they aid children in channelling their aggression and seen as a valuable vehicle to outgrowth vehemence. However he failed to address how this could help convince zero-tolerance parents who viewed violent toys as an encouragement of aggressive behaviours and violent attitude. Despite set in reasonable effort in his claim of having a healthy dose of craze, the result would as undesirable if violence had been misinterpreted or mishandled such as in the case of the 1999 columbine High School shootings. Turley should therefore be educating parents on command their children when playing with such violent toys and not exposing to children directly.
While Turley provides adequate amount of evidence from various professionals, the essence of the authors original argument that violent toys should be seen as ripe was lost in the midst of quoting the many opinions and research of other individuals. This makes it difficult to determine Turleys intentions, making the argument slight persuasive. One example is the introduction of Nancy Carlsson-Paige stating that toys came from manifested ideas of adults which seem to deviate and controvert Turleys point that playing with violent toys is beneficial. Instead Turley could have posted statistics to show how playing with toy guns helps children to understand violence to strengthen his claim further, especially since statistics for societies...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment