The Negatives Of Jury Nullification

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE COURT , NOW COMES ERIC WOOD TO toy BEFORE THE COURT THE ISSUE OF JURY NULLIFICATIONI . IntroductionThere is no denying that running play by dialog box from its enlightened origins up until the lay solar day has enjoyed a long and rich history . Since their introduction juries support provided the dose of human emotion and peer responsibility indispensable in American courts . More importantly juries as draw in the Constitution s Sixth and Seventh amendments , play a fundamental role in upholding and interpreting the laws the founders of American politics outlined in that just about sacred of documents . Yet today we find it imperative to question to what extent a control panel may take these laws and make them their own . That a gore may so easily subject laws created by piercing discussion and great hindsight to so capricious a dismissal leads us to question whether jury nullification in event undermines the rule of law imbedded in the American Constitution . Seen in this light it is not strange that courts in the past and the present have discouraged itAt no time were juries conferred with lawmaking pronouncement , yet the repeated use of jury nullification results in the altercation of laws made by the proper political science bodies . My arguments against instrument panel nullification revolve around two very real number possibilities . First and foremost , the over-use of jury nullification would result in the weakening of the American popular system . Secondly , jury nullification , has , can and will open the possibility of in the flesh(predicate) prejudice against the defendant by members of the juryII .

Jury Nullification and the separation of PowersThe legitimization of jury nullification could have notable consequences on the democratic and constitutional norms our country was built upon The founders of this country designed our government in such a way that laws came into being through a system of constant checks and balances Elected representatives would present polity initiatives based on the opinions , needs and desires of those they represent . From there these initiatives atomic number 18 thoroughly taken apart and examined in a multifariousness of committees made up of experts on the initiative being discussed . The bear down is then voted on by these committees , in addition to two houses of Congress . It is through this long exhaustive process that a law finally comes into beingYet there are some who mean a jury made up of everyday hatful from a variety of job specializations , some of which are disoriented with the science of law (The Positives of Jury Nullification ,. 2 ) should be able to overturn this long process at their flightiness . As St . John (1997 ) so succinctly put it : a jury cannot at once represent the community and do so in a majoritarian manner (p . 2564 . And as doubting Thomas Jefferson (1801 ) once wrote , The knowledge of character possessed by a single individual is of necessity limitedIII . The Unaccountable Nature of JuriesProbably the most glaring error in this way of thinking is that juries are jury and its integrants . Nor is...If you want to get a full essay, state it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .