Thursday, November 8, 2012

The Causes, Course & Consequences of the War for Texan Independence

The Ameri trick annexation of Texas was slow down until 1845 due to the schism in American politics everywhere the extension of slavery. The widespread American belief in its show Destiny to conquer the Southwest and West provided powerful ideologic support and motivation behind pro-annexationist senti manpowert. Great Britain was pro-Mexican during this period still played only a subordinate role in mediating between the Texans and Mexico.

Tejano-Mexican Relations Before 1821

Prior to the 18th century, the clean-handed northern frontier of Mexico which the province of Texas comprised was thinly populated by nomadic Native American Coahuilteca hunter-gatherer groups among whom the Apaches, Comanches and Yaquis regular(a)tually predominated. Indian inhabitants of Texas numbered nigh 32,300 in 1500. Spanish conquistador Alvarez de Pineda explored the Rio Grande region in 1519. The first major(ip) settlement was Mission San Juan Batista founded in 1699. In response to a French foray into Texas, the Spanish king ordered tidy sum reinforcements into the region. Beginning in the 1680s and culminating in 1716-1718 with the establishment of the fortified towns (presidios) of San Antonio de Bexar, la Bahia (Goliad) and Las Adaes, small numbers of soldiers, priests, ranchers and farmers immigrated north from Mexico. The settler population increase slowly from 3,000 in 1700 to 7,000 in 1800.


Lack, Paul D. "Occupied Texas: Bexar and Goliad, 1835-1836."

Zamora, Emilio, Cynthia Orozco, and Rodolfo Rocha, "Introduction." In Mexican Americans in Texan History, eds.

The Spanish and later Mexican governments viewed Texas as a strategical buffer zone against French and later Anglo incursions, only when the presidios in addition served as protection for the settlers against Indian raids. The weakness of the central Mexican government during the early 19th century made Texas even more rife than in the past with frontier strife. Congress' mandate of the Removal Act in 1830 forced Indian tribes vitamin E of the Mississippi River to move west of that river.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
Most of them went to the Arkansas and okeh territories but galore(postnominal) Cherokees, Choctaws and others crossed the northern and eastern Texas frontiers and raided pureness settlements in the 1830s. Houston, who had at times lived among the Cherokees, negotiated in February 1836 a agreement with the Cherokee Nation under which the Cherokees, in return for land grants in northeast Texas, would remain neutral during the war for independence. Ultimately, that and other treaties were broken, but Indian neutrality in 1836 was an important factor in the Texan victory over Mexico.

The leaders of the Texan revolution, men such as Austin and Houston, were pragmatists. The strongest motivation behind their stopping point for war was the protection of their economic interests, the retention of their lands, businesses and in many cases slaves which Santa Anna's march north threatened to destroy. Nevertheless, most of them and their compatriots in the joined States believed that Americans were superior to Mexicans whom they called derogatory names such as 'greasers.' Zamora et al. utter "Mexicans were portrayed as volatile and mercurial, cruel, ignorant, dishonest, superstitious and wholly incommensurate as fighters." These attitudes, which were racist by today's standards, contributed to the Anglo-Americans' belligerence and belief they can handle Santa
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.

No comments:

Post a Comment